On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:26:47 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:31 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:57:04 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > > > > Guys, I did a quick test with emotion_test (c version) and it's > > > leaking... I'm running home, but the relevant part is: > > > > > > ==19235== LEAK SUMMARY: > > > ==19235== definitely lost: 112 bytes in 6 blocks. > > > ==19235== indirectly lost: 240 bytes in 20 blocks. > > > ==19235== possibly lost: 37,053 bytes in 906 blocks. > > > ==19235== still reachable: 26,833,797 bytes in 8,821 blocks. > > > ==19235== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. > > > > > > almost 27mb of a simple video is really leaking something :-) > > > > still reachable is just irrelevant. never even bother with that. it's > > totally bogus. use memprof if anything. > > man, 2-5mb I'd say it's bullshit, like list node caches, pre > calculated tables, ... > > but 27mb?! it simply means some memory is allocated and tracked - and there is no shutdown for it. you want to check on memprof - and not the leaks. look at the profile > I did yet another test, but unfortunatelly I was recompiling efl > during that so the last part is "corrupted" and just show 0x2F, but it > might bring you attention to: > > ==28413== 4,942,080 bytes in 15 blocks are still reachable in loss > record 142 of 143 > ==28413== at 0x4005426: malloc (in > /usr/lib/valgrind/x86-linux/vgpreload_memcheck.so) > ==28413== by 0x42AFB47: _emotion_frame_format_update > (emotion_xine_vo_out.c:374) > ==28413== by 0x42E7CE3: (within /usr/lib/libxine.so.1.19.0) > ==28413== > ==28413== > ==28413== 18,115,480 bytes in 2,537 blocks are still reachable in loss > record 143 of 143 > ==28413== at 0x400487B: calloc (in > /usr/lib/valgrind/x86-linux/vgpreload_memcheck.so) > ==28413== by 0x4303FD3: xine_xmalloc (in /usr/lib/libxine.so.1.19.0) > ==28413== by 0x2F: ??? > ==28413== > ==28413== LEAK SUMMARY: > ==28413== definitely lost: 40 bytes in 4 blocks. > ==28413== possibly lost: 37,085 bytes in 908 blocks. > ==28413== still reachable: 26,848,760 bytes in 8,402 blocks. > ==28413== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. > > so of 27mb, 18mb is from xine_xmalloc() and 5mb is from emotion-xine > in _emotion_frame_format_update(): > > fr->vo_frame.base[0] = malloc(y_size + (2 * uv_size)); > > which does call _emotion_frame_data_free(), so it's not due calling > this function more than once (that would override the pointer and that > would also issue a "definitely lost"). > > I'm investigating where it's being lost... but I guess "fr" itself is > being lost somewhere. > > -- > Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > -------------------------------------- > Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ICQ#: 17249123 > Skype: gsbarbieri > Mobile: +55 (81) 9927 0010 > -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
