I wrote:
> There's a very simple way to have this ability in evas right,
> one that requires very few internal additions and no modifications
> to any of the current stuff.
>
That should've read "...to have this ability in evas right now,"
Note that this deosn't mean that implementing any particular new obj
type would be easy (some may, most won't), just that there'd be an
simple mechanism for adding such new object types, ie. of extending
evas in this way.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
