On Tue, 6 May 2008 14:03:03 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
we still use fwrite for writing to the eet file - buffering is good in f* funcs
- but yes, in theory read() for that example would work.
> In case you missed my question on IRC...
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Enlightenment CVS
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > f = fopen(file, "rb");
> > if (!f) return NULL;
> >
> > + if (fstat(fileno(f), &file_stat)
> > + || file_stat.st_size < 1)
> > + {
> > + fclose(f);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
>
> Is there any reason to not convert this to open/close instead of
> fopen/fclose? It would simplify the code as you would no longer need
> to use fileno at every point you access the associated fd.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
> Use priority code J8TL2D2.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>
--
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
