On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Peter Wehrfritz wrote:
>> stop confusing e17
>> ee_window_min_max_size_set(Ewl_Window *win)
>> {
>> + int min_w, min_h, max_w, max_h;
>> DENTER_FUNCTION(DLEVEL_STABLE);
>> DCHECK_PARAM_PTR(win);
>> DCHECK_TYPE(win, EWL_WINDOW_TYPE);
>>
>> + min_w = ewl_object_minimum_w_get(EWL_OBJECT(win));
>> + min_h = ewl_object_minimum_h_get(EWL_OBJECT(win));
>> + max_w = ewl_object_maximum_w_get(EWL_OBJECT(win));
>> + max_h = ewl_object_maximum_h_get(EWL_OBJECT(win));
>> +
>> + if (min_w > max_w)
>> + min_w = max_w;
>> + if (min_h > max_h)
>> + min_h = max_h;
>> +
>> ecore_x_icccm_size_pos_hints_set(INTPTR_TO_INT(win->window),
>> 0, ECORE_X_GRAVITY_NW,
>> -
>> ewl_object_minimum_w_get(EWL_OBJECT(win)),
>> -
>> ewl_object_minimum_h_get(EWL_OBJECT(win)),
>> -
>> ewl_object_maximum_w_get(EWL_OBJECT(win)),
>> -
>> ewl_object_maximum_h_get(EWL_OBJECT(win)),
>> + min_w, min_h,
>> + max_w, max_h,
>> 0, 0, /* base */
>> 0, 0, /* step */
>> 0, 0); /* aspect */
>> -
>> +
>> DLEAVE_FUNCTION(DLEVEL_STABLE);
>> }
>
> E17 is a bit confused if you set a minimum size to a window that is
> greater then the maximum size. I don't know which value should win, we
> chose the maximum value. Vincent said that metacity uses the minimum value.
raster: should some tests on the max and min values be done in
ecore_x_icccm_size_pos_hints_set() or in e17 about the possibility to have
max < min for height and width (like in the patch) ?
Vincent
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
