On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 10:16:18AM +0200, Vincent Torri wrote: >> in eet_lib.c, line 546, the use of ferror () is wrong. The doc says that >> it returns 0 on success, and a non zero value on failure, but no doc says >> that its returned value is an errno value.
Correct and fixed in svn. > You are absolutely right. Looking at this, isn't the if (ef->fp) check > after sign_error redundant? We can't be sure that ef->fp is currently valid. -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
