On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:31:57 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> > > On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Enlightenment SVN > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Log: > >> hmmm - no. Edje-Vera-Bold is a pointless addition. why? it's not defined > >> anywhere! you would need a fonts {} sectin that maps Edje-Vera-Bold to a > >> .ttf file inlined into the .edj files. We don't included these anymore in > >> the theme. We use the (these days) standard Sans font on the system. the > >> solution to it missing/not working (when a bold style is used) is not > >> adding fallbacks in to fonts that don't exist. I have never seen any > >> problem with this, so those that do should be checking why the Sans and > >> Sans:style=Bold fontconfig font declarations don't work (lack of those > >> fonts on their system? bad fontconfig setup? maybe a bug in evas's > >> fontconfig support?) > > > > missing fontconfig or systems without fonts at all, it's a weird case, > > but happened to me already. > > no fontconfig on Windows CE OS :) no e17 either... :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel