On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:40:16 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> <barbi...@profusion.mobi> said:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:17:28 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> said:
>> >
>> >> On 1/23/10, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:13:25 +0100 Albin Tonnerre
>> >> > <albin.tonne...@gmail.com> said:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:02 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > to summarize:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > * ecore_txt moved in eina
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I think we'll just have to agree to disagree here :)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > * ecore_job merged in ecore
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I've made a patch doing this.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > * nothing done for ecore_file (raster wants it in ecore)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Do you mean ecore_input here ?
>> >> >
>> >> > no. ecore-file. can't put ecore-file in eina. it stays as ecore-file or
>> >> > gets renamed to e-file-lib or whatevrr - but thats pointless as all u
>> >> > are doing is
>> >> > changing its name. it still cant be used by evas due to ecore-file
>> >> > needing ecore - and ecore-evas needing evas. so it stays
>> >>
>> >> ecore_file, with the exception of file_download, is very simple
>> >> abstraction and helpers are generaly useful (rm -r, mkdir -p...) and
>> >> i'd consider them at the same category as eina_mempool and
>> >> eina_module, so eina isla good place.
>> >
>> > ecore_file ALSO has the file monitoring stuff - which needs a mainloop.
>> > so... no can do in eina. ecore-file should stay where it is.
>>
>> ok, but still against moving ecore_file_dir_get(),
>> ecore_file_file_get() out of it?! these are basic and some of these
>> functions are already duplicated internally in Eina for use in places
>> like ecore_module anyway... ecore_file_rm_recursive and friends are
>> generally useful, IMHO they should even be in libC/posix, as we can't
>> change that, so move to eina.
>
> then you have some file stuff in eina, some in ecore-file - sounds not so good
> to me.
Ok, but you have to agree that file downloading, monitoring and simple
operations are very, very different. For instance I bet that even
kernel does not have inotify inside fs/ folder :-P
I'm rather rename to avoid conflicts:
- eina_fs_{cp,mv,...} (basic file operations)
- ecore_inotify or ecore_file_monitor (but it can also monitor
directories...)
- ecore_con_file_download
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--------------------------------------
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference
attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through
interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
