On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com>wrote:
> valgrind is happy with elm's own genlist tests.... what are you doing so > differently? > I just ran: valgrind --leak-check=full elementary_test Did nothing but looking at the main page (and then closing it with the 'X'). And I got: ==16449== LEAK SUMMARY: ==16449== definitely lost: 768 bytes in 3 blocks ==16449== indirectly lost: 6,340 bytes in 317 blocks ==16449== possibly lost: 186,566 bytes in 985 blocks ==16449== still reachable: 526,725 bytes in 5,238 blocks So I'm not really sure valgrind is happy at all :P (Maybe my e version isn't new enough, I'm using 46848, but even that, would that leak so much?) -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
