On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote: > > > On Mon, 31 May 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > >> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Christopher Michael wrote: >>> >>>> On 05/31/2010 03:08 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Vincent Pomageot wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Entrance has been removed from svn 3 month ago. >>>>>> You can get it by checking out a revision before 46590. >>>>> >>>>> as quaker still don't want to (can't ?) work on a new entrance, I'm >>>>> more >>>>> inclined to add it again to svn. He deleted it by saying a new one will >>>>> be added soon. 3 months later, nothing. The good thing would have be to >>>>> add an "entrance2" and do the move *after* the new code is in svn, >>>>> whatever the status of entrance was. >>>>> >>>>> Vincent >>>>> >>>> >>>> Or the other way ... moving 'entrance' to OLD (rather than total >>>> removal), >>>> and start working on entrance2 :) >>> >>> same thing, what is important is to not remove the old code before the >>> new one is in svn >> >> the code was broken and causing more harm than good. Actually it >> should have been removed way before. > > no, it should have been fixed. And btw, it's strange. I have several reports > from users that said that it was working.
I tried to fix it like years ago, before giving up in the amount of brokeness in code I've found and possible cases to fall in bugs. Then for my own good, even tho I fixed my current issue at the time, I moved to something else and -locked option was introduced. Entrance was full of possible races, missing signals and so on, that's why I suggested writing a new one instead of digging into lots of incorrect code. Except by the theme, nothing was worth re-using, and frankly the theme was not that useful as it was based on blingbling and we rather go more "default.edj" or even use Elementary for it and cut some work or deprecated library usage (esmart). Given that we have restricted resources, I followed raster's advice and did not waste my time in it at that point to focus on e17, as raster himself and others were doing. -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
