On Friday, July 16, 2010, Peter Wehrfritz <peter.wehrfr...@web.de> wrote:
> Enlightenment SVN schrieb:
>> Modified: trunk/TMP/st/elementary/src/lib/elm_main.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- trunk/TMP/st/elementary/src/lib/elm_main.c        2010-07-16 06:21:25 
>> UTC (rev 50276)
>> +++ trunk/TMP/st/elementary/src/lib/elm_main.c        2010-07-16 06:38:59 
>> UTC (rev 50277)
>> @@ -22,6 +22,32 @@
>>  static Elm_Version _version = { VMAJ, VMIN, VMIC, VREV };
>>  EAPI Elm_Version *elm_version = &_version;
>>
>> +Eina_Bool
>> +_elm_dangerous_call_check(const char *call)
>> +{
>> +   char buf[256];
>> +   const char *eval;
>> +
>> +   snprintf(buf, "%i.%i.%i.%i", VMAJ, VMIN, VMIC, VREV);
>
> Shouldn't the second argument be the buffer size, e.g. sizeof(buf)? Or
> am I missing something?


Yes, this is wrong.

-- 
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--------------------------------------
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to