On Domingo 15 Agosto 2010 14:33:06 Joerg Sonnenberger escribió: > edje: > The second paragraph is non-OSI and some parts are weird, e.g. the file > doesn't actually contain a copyright notice. I think the 2-clause BSD > license covers the intention and is OSI approved, but that's your call.
Edje's COPYING file[1] is quite similar to the Vorbis BSD-Like license[2] which was endorsed by Stallman[3] itself. Perhaps looking at the Vorbis pkgsrc might solve your packaging issues? [1] http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/browser/trunk/edje/COPYING [2] http://www.xiph.org/licenses/bsd/ [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vorbis#Licensing The "licence war" thing was already done and OSI compliance was not preferred nor considered a requirement IIRC. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
