On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Tom Hacohen <t...@stosb.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Lucas De Marchi < > lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > >> It's just that they are using the deprecated attribute to mark some >> functions they consider private. >> >> > I think they and I have a different definition of private. I don't put my > private functions in the shipped > includes, why do they?
Some people really likes to show their private parts. > -- > Tom. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
