On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:42:36 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> said:
> > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) > > <sachi...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actually do that. > >> It's probably a good idea, otherwise we'll keep thinking "damn this > >> annoying vtorri guy and his changelogs" every two and a half hours. > >> > >> > > I disagree. You don't want to force people who only "added a bit of > > documentation" or even use git-svn to go nuts. > > if we are not strict, it will be a huge mess. i agree with tom. changelog is about summarizing REAL changes so on a new release we have them all collected already. fixing a typo in some docs or "fixing code formatting" isnt worthy of a changelog. there isnt black and white here. its a matter of good judgment. if we see these things as black & white we w0ill have a useless changelog. thats what svn's log is for. if you implement some feature over several days and many commits, there is no need for many changelog entires. there is only the need for 1 changelog saying that you added the feature. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
