On 03/14/2011 01:42 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:15:07AM +0100, Mathieu Taillefumier wrote: >> - gnutls_transport_set_ptr(cl->session, (gnutls_transport_ptr_t)cl->fd); >> + gnutls_transport_set_ptr(cl->session,(gnutls_transport_ptr_t)(long) >> cl->fd); > > s/long/uintptr_t/ you mean.
Yes, I do. Thanks for the correction. As I explained, it seems that there is a design flow in their API. They are using void type instead of int that's why compilers issue a warning on 64 bits machines. It is still an ugly hack. Mathieu > > Joerg > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit > for your organization - today and in the future. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
