On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:20:12 +0000 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz <m...@zentific.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:08:53 +0000 > > Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Enlightenment SVN > >> <no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote: > >> > Log: > >> > +eeze_udev_syspath_get_devname, thanks to Clement Battin > >> > >> damn naming scheme... it should be devname_get not the other way > >> around... bad Discomfitor! > >> > >> > > no, eeze_udev uses a different naming scheme. > > I've noticed, bummer! But why so? It makes coding a less interesting > thing as you make more mistakes :-( > > I changed it for 2 reasons: 1) Reminder that there will never be eeze_udev_*set functions 2) Reminder that the results are stringshared (other eeze functions do NOT return stringshared values) -- Mike Blumenkrantz Zentific: NULL pointer dereferences now 50% off! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
