On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 23:26:09 +0100 (CET) > Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: >> >>>>> I have recently been doing some work with my servers again and found a bug >>>>> in ecore's configure process: if X is not installed on the machine, ecore >>>>> will still attempt to build ecore_x, leading to compile failure. >> >>> checking whether ecore_x with XCB backend is to be built... no >>> checking for X... no >>> checking X11/X.h usability... yes >>> checking X11/X.h presence... yes >>> checking for X11/X.h... yes >> >> so it seems that, actually, X is installed >> >> Vincent > no, I just have some X headers on the machine. there are no X-related > libraries > installed. if there are X headers, then X has been installed previously. If the uninstallation has not been correctly done, it's the packager's fault, not ecore. remove the headers or pass the correct 'disable' option to configure Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
