On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:29:22 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> said:
> > > On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:13:19 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri > > <vto...@univ-evry.fr> said: > > > >> > >> Hey > >> > >> we are deleting the .la files for the mempool modules. I think that we > >> should provide them. It's the packager of the distro who has to decide > >> whether or not to delete it. > >> > >> What do you think ? > > > > only for installed libraries. for modules they are of zero use to the > > packager or any developer (unlike libeina.la, libedje.la, libevas.la etc. > > which are of use to libtool at link time). they are not used in any way by > > any of efl at runtime for module loading (different story *IF* we used > > libltdl, but we don't). so its' just useless installcruft :) > > so I have fo fix the uninstallation : as we removed the .la file ourself, > the uninstall rule, which is based on it, does not delete the module that's indeed bad. if we co customising installs we end up having to write custom uninstall rules too. :( -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fulfilling the Lean Software Promise Lean software platforms are now widely adopted and the benefits have been demonstrated beyond question. Learn why your peers are replacing JEE containers with lightweight application servers - and what you can gain from the move. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfemails _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
