On Mon, 23 May 2011 12:41:24 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr>
said:

> 
> 
> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 23 May 2011 12:12:35 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> > <vto...@univ-evry.fr> said:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Vincent Torri wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> >>>> <vto...@univ-evry.fr> said:
> >>>>
> >>>> that requires i read the changelog and commit those patches - and it
> >>>> takes time. as you said.
> >>>
> >>> A lot less than what cedric is doing right now
> >>
> >> to be precise :
> >>
> >>   * you said that you didn't backport your fixes, and you would do the
> >> backports later
> >>   * cedric is doing that works and it takes a LOT of time
> >
> > yes. i'd do it later. i havent done it yet.
> >
> >> What I want is that, for the future fixes that you will do and for those
> >> who need a backport, you immediatly do the backport. That way is faster
> >> that what cedric is doing.
> >
> > actually it isn't. :) its the exact same work.
> 
> No : for example, I don't need to read the changelog : i know i have to 
> put it at the end. So it's faster. What I do when i backport immediatly:
> 
>   * i change the code
>   * i append the changelog message at the end
>   * i create a diff
>   * i apply it in the branch
>   * i commit both changes
> 
> what cedric has to do when the backport is not done :
> 
> he read the changelog, he must verify that the comit is actually something 
> to backport. He has to get the diff, apply it to the branch and update the 
> changelog and commit. That takes a lot more time than doing the backport 
> immediatly.

a commit when backported immediately runs the risk also of having to be updated
again and backported again a day later and again and again as the 1 fix
evolves. there is nothing i can do right now that makes any of this easier or
simpler.

> >
> >> Vincent
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Vincent
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Log:
> >>>>>> ecore: backport r58033.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> it takes more time to read the changelog and see which commit has to be
> >>>>> backported than backported immediatly
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Raster, can you please backport immediatly your commits (if necessary) ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Vincent
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Author:       cedric
> >>>>>> Date:         2011-05-23 01:54:49 -0700 (Mon, 23 May 2011)
> >>>>>> New Revision: 59612
> >>>>>> Trac:         http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/59612
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Modified:
> >>>>>>  branches/ecore-1.0/ChangeLog
> >>>>>> branches/ecore-1.0/src/lib/ecore_evas/ecore_evas_util.c
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Modified: branches/ecore-1.0/ChangeLog
> >>>>>> ===================================================================
> >>>>>> --- branches/ecore-1.0/ChangeLog       2011-05-23 07:51:44 UTC (rev
> >>>>>> 59611) +++ branches/ecore-1.0/ChangeLog        2011-05-23 08:54:49 UTC
> >>>>>> (rev 59612) @@ -30,3 +30,8 @@
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>        * Fix: ecore_con_url_ftp_upload upload the file until the end.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +2011-03-23  Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +        * Fix: ecore-evas interceptor didn't handle override-redirect
> >>>>>> +        windows correctly, expecting a feed-back event from x, which
> >>>>>> it didn't
> >>>>>> +        get.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Modified: branches/ecore-1.0/src/lib/ecore_evas/ecore_evas_util.c
> >>>>>> ===================================================================
> >>>>>> --- branches/ecore-1.0/src/lib/ecore_evas/ecore_evas_util.c
> >>>>>> 2011-05-23 07:51:44 UTC (rev 59611) +++
> >>>>>> branches/ecore-1.0/src/lib/ecore_evas/ecore_evas_util.c
> >>>>>> 2011-05-23 08:54:49 UTC (rev 59612) @@ -57,11 +57,12 @@ /*
> >>>>>> Interceptors Callbacks */
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> static void
> >>>>>> -_ecore_evas_obj_intercept_move(void *data, Evas_Object *obj
> >>>>>> __UNUSED__, Evas_Coord x, Evas_Coord y) +_ecore_evas_obj_intercept_move
> >>>>>> (void *data, Evas_Object *obj, Evas_Coord x, Evas_Coord y) {
> >>>>>>    Ecore_Evas *ee = data;
> >>>>>>    // FIXME: account for frame
> >>>>>>    ecore_evas_move(ee, x, y);
> >>>>>> +   if (ecore_evas_override_get(ee)) evas_object_move(obj, x, y);
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> static void
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
> >>>>>> Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its
> >>>>>> next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran
> >>>>>> developers boost performance applications - including clusters.
> >>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> enlightenment-svn mailing list
> >>>>>> enlightenment-...@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-svn
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
> >>>>> Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its
> >>>>> next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran
> >>>>> developers boost performance applications - including clusters.
> >>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> >>>>> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
> >>>> The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    ras...@rasterman.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
> >>> Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its
> >>> next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran
> >>> developers boost performance applications - including clusters.
> >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> >>> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
> > The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    ras...@rasterman.com
> >
> >
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
> Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its 
> next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran 
> developers boost performance applications - including clusters. 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> 


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    ras...@rasterman.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its 
next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran 
developers boost performance applications - including clusters. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to