On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Vincent Torri <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2011, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>> It's already done in other libs such as evas, edje, eina, ...
>>
>> And ecore has missing documentations on the website due to this.
>> http://docs.enlightenment.org/auto/ecore/
>> Compare this with Evas documentation.
>> http://docs.enlightenment.org/auto/evas/
>
> i would like to do the contrary for all the libraries : having a .dox file
> in doc/. One of the reason is to update the version number automatically
> with configure. See line 13 of the current Ecore.h. The other solution would
> be to have an Ecore.h modified by configure, and I don't like this.
>
> The other reason is to not pollute the main header with such doc and to
> actually give a documentation of all the components of an EFL in a single or
> several dox files

I don't know much about your plan, idea, but one of the good point of
moving doc to header, is that we could generate doc with just the
header (so any distribution that provide a dev package, can be the
source of a local doxygen doc). I personally dislike the fact that our
header are growing that much and much prefer eina's header, where each
of the functionnality have it's own header... But that's another
discussion, so just forget my last grumbl :-)
-- 
Cedric BAIL

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, 
you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
Download your free trial now. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to