Am Sat, 23 Jul 2011 08:14:55 +0200 (CEST) schrieb Vincent Torri:
>
>
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>
> > Log:
> > Ecorexx::Timer design changed to have a factory and provide destroy
> > function to wrap C interface better than before also used sigc++
> > slots as callback provider
>
> what about using shared_ptr for your factory ?
I thought about it. Even at elementaryxx where I use the same design.
I've that CountedPtr class in elmxx and use it at some places. But for
this use cases I decided against it. I don't remember the exact reason
for elementaryxx...
But at the end the C object is killing itself. Also a shared smart
pointer doesn't solve all problems in my eyes. It could solve the
problem that after some point I have an dangerous pointer which points
nowhere as in the C interface. But this comes with some other negative
side effects in the interface.
But if you've ideas how to solve it better please come up with a better
implementation to discuss it. I'm really open for this. :-)
regards
Andreas
--
Technical Blog <http://andreasvolz.wordpress.com/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Storage Efficiency Calculator
This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that
has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage-
ments, worldwide. Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to
the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
