On 06/10/11 04:32, EunMi Lee wrote: > Dear Tom, > > Thanks for reporting that issue :) > I could not think about event_flags problem when I add touch event. > So, I'm trying to solve that problem and I'd like to share my idea. > > The basic idea is "connecting event_flags between mouse(multi) event and > touch event". > Actually touch event comes from mouse(multi) event, so I think they can be > connected. > - touch down comes from mouse down and multi down. > - touch move comes from mouse move and multi move. > - touch up comes from mouse up and multi up. > > In the current code, mouse(multi) event is sent to all object and then touch > event is sent to the all object again. > I think we can send mouse(multi) event and touch event at a time for one > object. > It means, "send mouse(multi) event to the first object and then send touch > event to the first object, and repeat that for all objects" > If it is done, I think I can add event_flags for touch event and then pass > event_flags from mouse(multi) event to touch event and pass to the > mouse(multi) event again. > I will be brief as follows: > ---------------------------------------------- > set mouse/multi event's event_flags to the touch event's one. > send touch event to the object with event_flags. > set changed touch event's event_flags to the mouse/multi event's event_flags. > ----------------------------------------------- >
I think it'll work, with emphasis on sending it one level at a time (i.e one object at a time) because otherwise you depend on what comes first, mouse_down or touch_event. The real question is: do you really need it? What we did to overcome the lack of a unified object in gesture_layer was "normalizing" input events. We just created our own touch_event internally, and converted mouse_down/multi_down (or any other event) to them, only in our code. What do you think about removing this from upstream and moving it to your code? Everyone else: what do you think? -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
