On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:35:59 +0200 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com> said:
> Hey guys, > > In commit 63771 I added support for adding additional data to edje > signals, and in commit 63773 I added additional info to > entry,changed,user which allows users of the API to implement undo/redo > nicely. > > It should work just fine for "simple" entries but there's still one > issue I'm aware of with entries that have formats (redo will miss the > format in some cases). > > I went with the regular edje way and did it with signals. To be honest, > I don't like the "delayed" invocation that much, I prefer the smart > callbacks instant call behaviour. > > I just want to hear what you think about what's done there ATM and also, > if you have better ideas. I'd like to hear your thoughts about both the > method of passing additional info with signals (may have other uses as > well) and about the implementation of the change info. > well here's my take. signals are a generic abstract way to talk with edje. it literally allows edje to even have the whole engine run in another process/thread and handle signals off there. the design allows it so in future we could take advantage of that. but this create complications - like anything (x is a good example as its also async). you could ADD smart callbacks for the edje signals and transition to use those instead within elm_entry. i think this is probably ok. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
