On Thursday, 13 October 2011, at 15:26:56 (+0200), Tomas Cech wrote: > I think we'll remove RHEL 4, 5, 6 since builds doesn't work (there > might be legal problems to make it working) and because CentOS is > binary compatibile with RHEL. CentOS 5 seems to be too old for E17, > feel free to play with that if you want, but I don't think it's worth > of time.
The spec files I maintain (in SVN) build just fine on RHEL5/CentOS 5; they were used to build the packages for RHEL5 and RHEL6 we post on our web site. I haven't tried building in awhile, but I haven't seen any changes go by that worried me. Perhaps I missed something... > RHEL4 will probably have later some issues as CentOS 5. RHEL4 should be eliminated as a target. We terminated support for that awhile back. > That is CentOS 5. We could backport lua to this project to fix this > issue, but it has low priority. The repository on enlightenment.org has the lua packages required for RHEL5 already posted (and tested). Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <m...@kainx.org> Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "My program's in an infinite loop. Should I wait for it to finish?" -- some lame luser in a Tarleton State Univ. computer lab ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
