On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Enlightenment SVN <no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote: > Log: > and disable invalidate optimization > > > > Author: raster > Date: 2011-10-21 03:00:03 -0700 (Fri, 21 Oct 2011) > New Revision: 64249 > Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/64249 > > Modified: > trunk/evas/src/lib/canvas/evas_render.c > > Modified: trunk/evas/src/lib/canvas/evas_render.c > =================================================================== > --- trunk/evas/src/lib/canvas/evas_render.c 2011-10-21 09:59:13 UTC (rev > 64248) > +++ trunk/evas/src/lib/canvas/evas_render.c 2011-10-21 10:00:03 UTC (rev > 64249) > @@ -1295,7 +1295,7 @@ > _evas_render_check_pending_objects(&e->pending_objects, e); > > /* phase 1. add extra updates for changed objects */ > - if (e->invalidate || e->render_objects.count <= 0) > +/* if (e->invalidate || e->render_objects.count <= 0)*/ > clean_them = _evas_render_phase1_process(e, > &e->active_objects, > &e->restack_objects,
This optimisation does really impact performance on low end hardware when they are not using evas map. Could you tell me what was the issue ? How to reproduce it ? So I can bring this optimisation back in. Thanks -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
