On 07/11/11 09:07, David Seikel wrote: > I plan on pulling out one of those functions (plus others) and replacing > them with something more generic later anyway. But not now. I'll > think it through properly when I do that. It's just internal support > stuff, but at the time I was in my "don't mess with rasters code until > I talk with him about it" mode. > > So one function is const, the other is not. Casting would have to be > done somewhere between them to stop the bitching.
And hence the spank and my objection to suppressing the errors, you'll just end up forgetting. -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
