On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Kim Woelders wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:43:04 +0100, Enlightenment SVN > <no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote: > >> Log: >> Ecore_X: Fix array problem for 64-bit (unsigned long vs unsigned int). >> Thanks vtorri ;) >> >> Author: devilhorns >> Date: 2011-11-11 11:43:04 -0800 (Fri, 11 Nov 2011) >> New Revision: 65076 >> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/65076 >> >> Modified: >> trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_x/xlib/ecore_x_window_prop.c >> >> Modified: trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_x/xlib/ecore_x_window_prop.c >> =================================================================== >> --- trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_x/xlib/ecore_x_window_prop.c 2011-11-11 >> 19:12:36 UTC (rev 65075) >> +++ trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_x/xlib/ecore_x_window_prop.c 2011-11-11 >> 19:43:04 UTC (rev 65076) >> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ >> return -1; >> } >> for (i = 0; i < num_ret; i++) >> - val[i] = ((unsigned long *)prop_ret)[i]; >> + val[i] = ((unsigned int *)prop_ret)[i]; >> num = num_ret; >> *plst = val; >> } >> > This "fix" is incorrect - man XGetWindowProperty. then val is wrong Vincent > > ... and if it weren't there are four more occurrences of ((unsigned long > *)prop_ret)[i] in the file. > > /Kim > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
