On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[email protected]> wrote: > +1
You are getting to much social :-) > Could we also move to cmake? How about git? I can have people to help with > both. We did the webkit EFL cmake in short time, can do for EFL as well. > > Thanks for taking this long due change! First about git. Today tool provided to do review and managing branch are just amazing. I am thinking about gerrit, but also github and gittorrious. So if we switch to git, we need to have this kind of tool so it will be usefull. I see it will be also much more easy to do backport. So I am now on the side that if we describe properly how to contribute after switching to git, the tool are now great and it's worth doing the switch. I would just postpone it until we do release e17, elm, eio, ethumb and emotion. About cmake, I don't know its current status, but in the past I did suffer from its lack of portability and limitation to do cross compilation. Before any switch to it, I want to be sure that all this issue are solved. That we will be able to provide a working build on all our target system and that we can easily do all cross compilation. -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Systems Optimization Self Assessment Improve efficiency and utilization of IT resources. Drive out cost and improve service delivery. Take 5 minutes to use this Systems Optimization Self Assessment. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51450054/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
