Thank you Bruno and Gustavo > You have a good point, calling the same function twice isn't good. > > On the other side, we are trying to keep a simple, consistent API. > We have lots of relevant properties for each widget that is set with > some default value on add() and later the user can set it as intended. > > For example, we have a clock, we can set if it's am/pm or 24h, if it > show seconds or not, ... > If we add new add() functions for each property, and possible > combinations (otherwise we would have to choose some default > properties anyway), we would have a bloated API, hard to understand > and use. For example: > > elm_clock_24_show_seconds_add() > elm_clock_24_no_seconds_add() > elm_clock_am_pm_show_seconds_add() > elm_clock_am_pm_no_seconds_add() > > It wouldn't scale, imho. Do you agree ?
Acccepted ;) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
