On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 19:54:19 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 19:35:01 +1000 David Seikel <onef...@gmail.com>
> said:
> 
> > Do we want to return the library version?
> > 
> > PACKAGE_VERSION?
> > 
> > edje_version?
> > 
> > EDJE_VERSION_MAJOR and EDJE_VERSION_MINOR?
> > 
> > EDJE_FILE_VERSION and EDJE_FILE_MINOR? Should those be bumped to
> > track Lua API changes to?
> > 
> > Something new like EDJE_EXTERNAL_TYPE_ABI_VERSION?  
> 
> probably a table with 2 numbers - major and minor version. no micro.

Yes, but which of the above is the source of these two numbers?  Who's
version are we actually reporting?

-- 
A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to