On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:42:50 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> Hi all, > > Recently we changed Elementary in some radical ways and while we tried > to fix SVN usage to cope with new behavior, I truly think we need to > do a proper release before calling it 1.0, in order to let a broader > number of people to test and check their software against it. After > this feedback, if no showstopper happens, we can just bump it to 1.0 > and be happy. > > This can be either as a 0.99 or as release candidate (RC). The number > doesn't matter. What does matter is to take it as serious as before: > we get them packaged for major distros. It would be great to highlight > distros MUST package it, and include the > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/ElementaryChanges in the > documentation and release notes. > > We developers are so bound to SVN that often forget that people do use > Elementary from packages. We need their feedback as well. > > That's it, let's have this formal release before calling it 1.0? > I am strongly in favor of this. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
