On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 19:08:45 +1000 David Seikel <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 09:56:07 +0100 Vincent Torri > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 9:28 AM, David Seikel <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 08:59:41 +0100 Vincent Torri > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Carsten Haitzler > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 08:46:43 +0100 Vincent Torri > > >> > <[email protected]> said: > > >> > > > >> >> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Carsten Haitzler > > >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> > On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 07:41:49 +0100 Vincent Torri > > >> >> > <[email protected]> said: > > >> >> > > > >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Enlightenment SVN > > >> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> >> > Log: > > >> >> >> > and work more on getting release in shape - version > > >> >> >> > requirements. > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > (god this is a pain in the butt) > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> we must simplify all this (for future releases, as you did > > >> >> >> all the work for the next one). > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> I propose to put the dep version requirements in the "### > > >> >> >> Needed information" part of configure (I've added such part > > >> >> >> in some configure.ac, like in eina) > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> You also should really consider using configure to modify > > >> >> >> the *_VERSION_MINOR in the *.h files. It adds *.h.in > > >> >> >> files, but you're sure you don't forget it and you'll have > > >> >> >> less things to do. Especially now that the number of EFL > > >> >> >> that we release is growing. That's the kind of feature we > > >> >> >> should use. I know that you don't like that, but the > > >> >> >> release process must be simplified. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > single efl tree will fix all of this. everything will get > > >> >> > the same version... and they will end up all #including a > > >> >> > common parent header etc. etc. :) 1 point for version :) > > >> >> > > >> >> same version ? what about eet ? So some (eio, etc...) will be > > >> >> bumped directly to 1.3 or more ? > > >> > > > >> > yeah - probably will bump to 1.7 or something for everything. > > >> > > > >> > > >> I know you are busy with the release, but if you can write a mail > > >> with more precisions about what you want in that single tree (the > > >> directories, etc...), i (and maybe others too) can begin to write > > >> the infrastructure and the autotools > > > > > > There was quite a long thread about that end of last year called > > > "new build tree for efl." I'll quote the beginning of it to help > > > you find it. (In the middle of dinner, so no time to go search > > > for it in the archives for you.) > > > > > > Message-Id: <[email protected]> > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 12:32:00 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The > > > Rasterman) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> ok - this 10 gazillion separate libraries is just not managable. > > >> we are going to make a single build and source tree for efl. that > > >> means core efl. that means 1 configure script for all. 1 base > > >> makefile tree. something like: > > >> > > >> efl > > >> efl/src > > >> efl/src/evas/... > > >> efl/src/eina/... > > >> efl/src/edje/... > > >> ... > > > > not enough. For example: > > > > efl/src/eina/include > > efl/src/eina/lib > > efl/src/eina/doc > > > > or > > > > efl/doc > > efl/src/eina/include > > efl/src/eina/lib > > > > or > > > > efl/doc > > efl/src/include > > efl/src/eina/lib > > > > or ... ? > > > > I want something more precise > > Did you read the thread? Might be more in there, or might not. OK, I just read it. 99% of it is side tracked into talking about git and cmake. Might as well ignore it and hope raster has time to be more precise. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
