On Tue, 08 May 2012 10:52:21 +0300 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> said:
> On 08/05/12 10:41, Vincent Torri wrote: > > http://eodev.sourceforge.net/eo/doc/html/index.html > > > > it's a C++ library that has eo as namespace. That means that if > > someone writes a C++ binding of our Eo, its namespace will conflict > > withthe above library if they are used together. > > Again, good point, please convince raster/cedric. I don't really care > about the naming, they wanted something short and cedric suggested eo. > Ask them what name they prefer and I'll change it, I don't really care. :) it's ultimately not even going to be libeo - it's going to be part of libefl... so it's moot. eo saves us typing lots of extra "bj" chars. we don't need extra bj's in our code - just more slapping on the kbd we don't need. :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
