On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 06:56:39PM -0300, Jose Souza wrote: >> So its better move performance test to elm? Or remove performance test >> from build, and add a script to compile manually? > > Imho moving to elm should be enough, it could be disabled by default > there and if enabled it won't create circular dependency like it does > now in e_dbus.
i'd say keep it disabled by default, do not build. Similar to what we do for evas examples that rely on ecore. after the efl is merged in one single tree, you add a SUBDIR after and it's all solved. -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
