okay, I know alloc checks are good and everything, but I'd really like to avoid turning the e17 codebase into a giant spaghetti monster with checking every alloc; if you're going to check one, check them all; we're not going to check them all. if it's not in e_sys_main or e_fm_op or e_alert, don't bother.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Enlightenment SVN < no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote: > Log: > E17: some alloc checks, and fix a case where we lost a pointer if > realloc() fails > > patch by Maxime Villard (rustyBSD) > > Author: caro > Date: 2012-08-29 23:36:38 -0700 (Wed, 29 Aug 2012) > New Revision: 75838 > Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/75838 > > Modified: > trunk/e/src/bin/e_editable.c trunk/e/src/bin/e_ilist.c > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
