On 10/10/12 11:00, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
>> <s.schm...@samsung.com> wrote:
>>> Image loaders are way more complicated sadly as we drag in
>>> dependencies here. I would vote for making jpeg, png, gif, bmp, eet
>>> on by default.
>>>
>>> For the others we might need to see what libs distros ship in a
>>> default installation so we can decide if we have a hard dep on these
>>> libs or not.
>>
>> Better would be to remove the options, but detect them at build time to
>> see if they should be included.  Things should never be hard
>> dependencies, unless they actually are.
>
> I see that you don't want to have this for your embedded project. :)
>
> But I disagree here. Autodetection is even worse in the case for the
> image loaders as your application will fail during runtime to load a
> theme or display thumbnails, etc. In your strictly controlled env this
> is not a problem as you can only blame yourself but in my opinion this
> is a no-no for almost all other users. Thus I would vote against
> autodetection and choose the hard deps carefully to fit the majority of
> our users.

I'm also against autodetection. I prefer strict option setting. But you 
want to have them (all?) on by default and just let people disable them 
if needed.

--
Tom.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to