On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Enlightenment SVN <no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote: > Log: > rpm spec for new edbus > > > Author: rui > Date: 2012-11-18 03:22:16 -0800 (Sun, 18 Nov 2012) > New Revision: 79417 > Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/79417 > > Added: > trunk/edbus/edbus.spec.in > Modified: > trunk/edbus/Makefile.am trunk/edbus/configure.ac > > Modified: trunk/edbus/Makefile.am > =================================================================== > --- trunk/edbus/Makefile.am 2012-11-18 10:01:47 UTC (rev 79416) > +++ trunk/edbus/Makefile.am 2012-11-18 11:22:16 UTC (rev 79417) > @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ > ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I m4 > CLEANFILES = > MAINTAINERCLEANFILES = > -EXTRA_DIST = > +EXTRA_DIST = \ > + edbus.spec > > SUBDIRS = doc > > > Modified: trunk/edbus/configure.ac > =================================================================== > --- trunk/edbus/configure.ac 2012-11-18 10:01:47 UTC (rev 79416) > +++ trunk/edbus/configure.ac 2012-11-18 11:22:16 UTC (rev 79417) > @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ > > AC_CONFIG_FILES([ > Makefile > +edbus.spec
I still think this should not be in upstream projects, but carried by distros. Why do we need this? IMO it's better maintained by people that care about it, i.e. package maintainers. And being both a package maintainer and a developer is no excuse to put this in upstream projects. Lucas De Marchi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
