On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:12:20 +1100 Mike McCormack <mi...@ring3k.org> wrote:
> On 11/24/2012 04:31 PM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote: > > Right. Each commit should be atomic/clean/lean/simple. > > +1 to bdilly > > > > But having huge amount of commits at once is annoying. > > It's hard to read/review. > > +1 to devilhorns > > Surely smaller commits are easier to review? > > Additionally, if a commit introduces a bug (it never happens, but... > ;-), it's easier to isolate and revert the offending commit, rather > than reverting everything. > > Lots of small commits is the git way, and probably not something that > somebody who has been using SVN for a long time is used to... And the plan is to move to git if I remember. So I suggest getting used to it. B-) Getting lots of commits in a big lump is how any distributed source control thingy often works. People make commits locally, how many local commits they keep laying around until they push them all out is up to them. I personally prefer to push things out quick, rather than keep them around for a week. It's also possible to pull from other peoples local copies, if they let you. You could pull when you want to from people that hoard their pushes. B-) -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
