Hi,

On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 11:09:35 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
>> <lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> said:
>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 01:58:49 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
>>> > <lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> said:
>>> >
>>> >> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Enlightenment SVN
>>> >> <no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote:
>>> >> > Log:
>>> >> > work around edbus issues by forcing the mainloop to run at least one
>>> >> >   cycle with some dummy things... in ipc launch mode.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >   also make selection jump to end if a newline is there - as disussed 
>>> >> > on
>>> >> >   ml.
>>> >>
>>> >> could you detail a little bit what is the issue. Looking at the code,
>>> >> I couldn't understand why you put all this ipc stuff, instead of doing
>>> >> something like eve does.
>>> >
>>> > leak here:
>>> >
>>> > ==23628== 120 (64 direct, 56 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
>>> > lost in loss record 70 of 107
>>> > ==23628==    at 0x4C29E84: calloc
>>> > (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==23628==    by
>>> > 0xB48344F: edbus_connection_name_get (edbus_core.c:476) ==23628==    by
>>> > 0xB482EA8: edbus_connection_name_object_set (edbus_core.c:413) ==23628==
>>> > by 0xB48DF6B: edbus_object_get (edbus_object.c:211) ==23628==    by
>>> > 0xB484E7A: _connection_get (edbus_core.c:941) ==23628==    by 0xB484FC1:
>>> > edbus_connection_get (edbus_core.c:968) ==23628==    by 0x8233529:
>>> > efreet_cache_init (efreet_cache.c:129) ==23628==    by 0x822433D:
>>> > efreet_init (efreet.c:78) ==23628==    by 0x4F28E2F: elm_need_efreet
>>> > (elm_main.c:449) ==23628==    by 0x408CCA: config_init (config.c:24)
>>> > ==23628==    by 0x40DA1B: elm_main (main.c:1003)
>>> > ==23628==    by 0x40E7FB: main (main.c:1322)
>>> > ==23628==
>>>
>>> we fixed this one... could you confirm it's ok now?
>>
>> yup. this one is gone... now you can look at the wonderful evas async 
>> leak... i
>> have a terminology using 6gb... :) pretty impressive if you ask me! :)
>
> Interestingly enough I don't see that bug in Terminology, but my
> Enlightenment is leaking fast and over one night it does have a crazy
> 1.5GB memory usage. I believe the issue are related.

Paulo Alcântara and Leandro are taking a look at this.

Regards,

-- 
Ulisses Furquim
ProFUSION embedded systems
http://profusion.mobi
Mobile: +55 19 9250 0942
Skype: ulissesffs

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to