On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:15:45 +0900 Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr>
wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 16, 2013, David Seikel wrote:
> >> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:50:08 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> >> <barbi...@profusion.mobi <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday, January 16, 2013, David Seikel wrote:
> >> > > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:48:14 -0800 "Enlightenment SVN"
> >> > > <no-re...@enlightenment.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Log:
> >> > > > add missing licenses references, fix copyright, add link
> >> > > > result notice.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Author:       barbieri
> >> > > > Date:         2013-01-16 13:48:14 -0800 (Wed, 16 Jan 2013)
> >> > > > New Revision: 82911
> >> > > > Trac:         http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/82911
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Modified:
> >> > > >   trunk/efl/COPYING trunk/efl/licenses/COPYING.BSD
> >> > > > trunk/efl/licenses/COPYING.LGPL
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Modified: trunk/efl/COPYING
> >> > > > ===================================================================
> >> > > > --- trunk/efl/COPYING 2013-01-16 21:47:37 UTC (rev 82910)
> >> > > > +++ trunk/efl/COPYING 2013-01-16 21:48:14 UTC (rev 82911)
> >> > > > @@ -1,11 +1,23 @@
> >> > > > -EFL comes with several licences. Listed are the
> >> > > > library/probject +EFL comes with several licences. Listed
> >> > > > are the library/project name and the license file covering
> >> > > > it.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >  evil:            licenses/COPYING.BSD
> >> > > > -escape:          licenses/COPYING.GPL
> >> > > > +escape:          licenses/COPYING.GPL (used in PlayStation
> >> > > > native) +eina:            licenses/COPYING.LGPL
> >> > > >  eet:             licenses/COPYING.BSD
> >> > > > -eina:            licenses/COPYING.LGPL
> >> > > >  eo:              licenses/COPYING.BSD
> >> > > >  evas:            licenses/COPYING.BSD
> >> > > > +embryo:          licenses/COPYING.SMALL
> >> > > >  ecore:           licenses/COPYING.BSD
> >> > > > -embryo:          licenses/COPYING.SMALL
> >> > > > +eio:             licenses/COPYING.LGPL
> >> > > > +edbus:           licenses/COPYING.LGPL
> >> > > > +efreet:          licenses/COPYING.BSD
> >> > > > +eeze:            licenses/COPYING.BSD
> >> > > > +ephysics:        licenses/COPYING.BSD
> >> > > > +edje:            licenses/COPYING.BSD
> >> > > > +edje/epp:        licenses/COPYING.GPL (separate
> >> > > > binary/executable) +emotion:         licenses/COPYING.BSD
> >> > > > +ethumb:          licenses/COPYING.LGPL
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > +NOTE: If linked together, the result will be LGPL (or GPL is
> >> > > > Escape is +used) due that license characteristics.
> >> > >
> >> > > Hmmm, guess that means the BSD licences are useless, since
> >> > > it's all gonna be linked together anyway, and thus GPL
> >> > > contaminated.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > That is right. For all purposes consider EFL = LGPL. We just
> >> > didn't change the license as it would require approvals. But
> >> > effectively it's all LGPL.
> >>
> >> I'll note that "effectively" changing it all to LGPL did not
> >> require approvals.
> >
> > Well, the resulting license is different. Indeed it will be LGPL.
> > But say you take Evas and remove eina dep, you could use that as
> > BSD.

You say that like it would be an easy thing to remove the eina
dependency from evas.  Note that there is nothing wrong with the eina
code, it's generally quite good code.

> Also writing Evas engine/loader/saver and Ecore_Evas/Ecore will be
> under BSD letting you write your own backend that doesn't require to
> be upstream, because we don't really care about all the crazy fb API
> in that world. Can be useful in some embedded case.

In my embedded case the only reason I can tell the client that he does
not have to worry about crazy virus licences is cause he's not
distributing binaries to other peolpe, they all remain under his
control.

The debate will rage on once more.  The people that thought they where
licensing their code under BSD will mewl ineffectively about their
rights being taken away.  The GPL people will smugly and effectively say
"ner ner ner, nothing you can do about it now".  In the end the debate
will be as ineffective as the BSD licence, the only likely result might
be the loss of some developers.

-- 
A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to