On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:40:53 +0000 Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 18/01/13 13:35, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Stefan Schmidt > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> We must bump required check's version. Could u do it? > >> > >> I would have done if I liked the idea. :) My problem is that the > >> ubuntu version listed above is the one I have installed on my work > >> machine. So I see the actual build problem. > > > > well, update it or --with-tests=none. > > > > the problem in using fail_unless() and fail_if() is that they are > > very non-helpful to debug. > > > > Libcheck has "_ck_assert_int" which is a generic thing that should be > used like this: > _ck_assert_int(5, <, 7); > > I don't really understand why he doesn't only use this. But anyhow, I > suggest we just steal this and use it all the time as it's way more > clear than his alternatives and are supported in all libcheck > versions. Even if it wasn't supported, it's really easy to implement: > #define _ck_assert_int(X, O, Y) ck_assert_msg((X) O (Y), "Assertion > '"#X#O#Y"' failed: "#X"==%d, "#Y"==%d", X, Y) > > So why not just use that? But then I wont be able to rant about rampant "justupdatitis". :-) Good idea Tom. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow - 350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
