On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:32:46 +0000 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> wrote:
> On 30/01/13 01:00, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Tom Hacohen <t...@stosb.com> wrote: > >> Well, we aren't doing the switch yet. Probably early next week. > >> But we are prepping the git repos now (it takes time, a few days > >> of actually *running*). > > > > > > sigh... days? Are you running this remotely or on the same machine > > svn is in? > > > > Another thing to consider to fixup the authors is actually running > > git-filter-branch after the repo is converted. It should be much > > shorter than "days". > > git-filter-branch can be fast or slow, depending on what you do. We > are working with a fast machine, doing everything on ram, and still > it takes time. I exaggerated with the "days", it's actually only 2 > days. We have to do a couple of things: Fix the authors, change the > commit message (change the git-svn line), go through all the commits > in the repo finding historic locations of repos and fixing up history > to work nicely. It's computing time. It's not our fault. We were also > surprised by the time it takes. > Seriously, try this on your own and you'll see. It's about two decades of source code and it's revision history, on multiple projects. I'm not surprised it takes a while to deal with it all. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
