On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 01:00:26 -0200 Iván Briano <sachi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> wrote: > > Of course we don't start a feature addition cycle if current master > > branch is unstable. The hope is to be on a more rapid development > > cycle, but still stable and avoiding glacial era like we have before > > each release. Finally it should give us a good release every 3 months. > > It should not change our workflow to much and still be an improvement > > over our current model. > > > > Any though or improvement about it ? Or a better proposal ? > > The question was whether we'll all have write permission to the master branch > and push stuff there as we do with SVN or if we'll keep our own repositories > and have someone(s) integrate them into upstream. > > > -- > > Cedric BAIL > > Having reviewer(s) who are the only people with commit access to certain repos may work for some side projects that we have, but, despite it being a good idea in theory, there's no real way for us to do it for larger components. We just don't have the manpower for it, and the reviewers, who must then also be our most knowledgeable developers, will immediately be buried with code to review and be unable to do any work of their own. Just ask raster about his backlog if you doubt this. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
