On 16/02/13 06:42, Jérôme Pinot wrote: >> On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:56:06 -0200 Rafael Antognolli >> <antogno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I know that this is not a poll, but I particularly prefer rebased >>> branches/commits too. > > LWN has a neat article about the git rebase thing: > http://lwn.net/Articles/328436/ > > "Thou Shalt Not Rebase Trees With History Visible To Others"
I agree with this which is why master and other branches are fast-forward only. Local branches are not "visible to others" in any case, that's pretty clear. What's not so clear is the developer branches in devs/user/ The link you mentioned states: """ [I]f you're still in the "git rebase" phase, you don't push it out. If it's not ready, you send patches around, or use private git trees (just as a "patch series replacement") that you don't tell the public at large about. """ I think we should handle them as private and people should not depend on them (the alternative is to have developers use private repositories which is a bit more complicated). Regards, Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel - in partnership with Geeknet, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials, tech docs, whitepapers, evaluation guides, and opinion stories. Check out the most recent posts - join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
