On 10/04/13 13:19, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:59:30 +0100 Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> said: > >> On 10/04/13 11:22, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >>> On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:48:53 +0100 Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> >>> said: >>> >>> in the rest of the code fs->current_size is the current active size for the >>> font instance - since multiple instances share the same source outline. by >>> setting it to 0 we are forcing an evaluation of font size by other font >>> instances sharing the same source. the code does this in several placesto >>> basically "flush the current size and re-eval". somwhere the font code gets >>> this font size tracking wrong, so this seems a good enough solution to that >>> problem. >> >> Yes, I understand the issue and I understand the solution, I'm just >> wondering why is the font source is modified like that will still being >> alive. Or in other words, why is the font size is marked as "done" in >> the int free function instead of finding a more elegant solution. > > its unreffed - so it may still be alive and shared/used. do you have a more > elegant solution at hand? > >
Didn't really look into it. Was just asking if she had considered it... You have to admit, it looks odd. -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account! http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
