On 12/06/13 15:37, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hey, >> >> Any specific reason for that? > > Yes, I was bored and with nothing else to do. No, seriously, as I > added a new example to eldbus and the executable to gitignore I > actually did it first on the respective subdir, but only then I found > that we had only one gitignore on the root dir. Of course, there are > both advantages and disadvantages for either approach, and no matter > what arguments we have for each, I know that it will end up being a > matter of taste. > > So, in my opinion, efl, elm and e projects have grown past the limit > of a single gitignore on the root dir. I discussed it briefly on the > chanel yesterday and decided to follow the kernel style. Looking at it > now, I guess I should have added a comment on the begining of the root > gitignore too. > > http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.9.5/.gitignore
OK, cool. Could you please add the comment then? So it'll have a better chance of being maintained over time? -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
