On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 08:50:50 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
<s.schm...@samsung.com> wrote:

> Hello.
> 
> On 09/03/2013 08:11 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > Coverity:
> > o EFL: Outstanding defects 452 (452) with a density of 0.85 (0.85).
> > 1 defects fixed since last build and 1 added.
> > o Elm: Outstanding defects 20 (20) with a density of 0.09 (0.09). 0
> > defects fixed since last build and 0 added.
> > o E: Outstanding defects 40 (200) with a density of 0.15 (0.73). 161
> > defects fixed since last build and 0 added.
> >
> > Obviously I don't believe the numbers for E. I will do another run
> > today for it.
> 
> I triggered another build but the numbers also make no sense albeit 
> difference. I would suggest we skip the numbers of this week and hope 
> the best for next week.

Which brings into question the accuracy of the other numbers.  Though
perhaps we really did managed to bring E close to perfection?  B-)

-- 
A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041391&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to