Dont you run the risk of patches falling through the cracks in terms of patches recieved on the mailing list?
On Wednesday 06 November 2013 15:26:57 Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 06/11/13 15:15, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > Why was gerrit rejected? > > Mainly because people didn't want to go through a review system and > because we don't have the man-power to review commits. Also, many of us > have their own area of expertise so approving commits will mostly be a > waste of time. > We already review commits post-push through the ML and we find that > sufficient. > > For "random" contributors we have Phabricator (for better or worse) and > a review system there. > > -- > Tom. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers > Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore > techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most > from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and > register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
