On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Stefan Schmidt <ste...@datenfreihafen.org>wrote:
> Hello. > > On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 18:10, Cedric BAIL wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Stefan Schmidt > > <ste...@datenfreihafen.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 13:14, Cedric BAIL wrote: > > >> I would like to give a proper dev access to our git to Sebastian Dröge > > >> (slomo on phab) who has been fixing up our emotion gstreamer backend > > >> lately (thanks god someone is taking care of it !). As he has already > > >> had a history of contributing to other open source software (like > > >> gstreamer) and I am by now close to do rubber stamping on his > > >> contribution on phab, I do think he will fit well with a developer > > >> access. > > > > > > THis makes me wonder what happened to our probie experiment. You > > > requested probie access for some devs a while ago. Did this access > > > help them? Are they on a good way to get proper access? > > > > They have pushed https://git.enlightenment.org/devs/rimmed/eflete.git/ > > and did some other patch around. They still should come forth to this > > mailing list and ask people for opinions and tests on it, but they > > seems to be still a little bit shy :-) For those who are adventurous I > > think it is already something testable, maybe not yet daily usable, > > hopefully it will reach that point. > > To me that means the probie access worksas it should. At least in the > sense of them having easier access without us have the risk of getting > overhelmed with changes we are not happy with. Whats missing seem to > be the path and motivation to go from probie to full access. > > > > For Sebastian you are asking for full access directly? > > > > Yes, as he is contributing directly to a core part of EFL that nobody > > is taking care at the moment (emotion gstreamer) and he has enough > > experience with the open source world that I trust him to do things > > right. > > Hi > We have used that model of trust for a long time and I would be fine > with giving Sebastian full access. In this case we should really > document the way we are giving out commit access to not make folks > feel bad that some get access diretcly one some are asked to go with > probie first. It was made clear in this threat how it would be judged > but having it written down would help to repeat it all again in a few > weeks. :) > > I fully agree with Stefan's suggestion about the documentation. Any updates on this? Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) > regards > Stefan Schmidt > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics > Pro! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
