Hi. It might be possible to refactor ewebkit2 to use EFL++ directly after dropping the support of the lower version of EFL.
But in my two cents, it's not important. Unfortunately, ewebkit2 developers not familiar with the latest EFL changes. They only have small experience with the EFL on the tizen. (me too. :/ ) By the way, I removed(and checked) the all of WebKit1/Efl (ewebkit) code from the webkit.org repository. (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134087) Should(Can) I remove ewebkit backend for elm_web ? Best Regards, Ryuan Choi 2014-07-01 18:39 GMT+09:00 Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com>: > On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:44:19 -0300 Felipe Magno de Almeida > <felipe.m.alme...@gmail.com> said: > > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Cedric BAIL <moa.blueb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Jun 21, 2014 2:26 AM, "Carsten Haitzler" <ras...@rasterman.com> > wrote: > > >> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 21:25:54 -0300 Felipe Magno de Almeida > > >> <felipe.m.alme...@gmail.com> said: > > >> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Carsten Haitzler < > ras...@rasterman.com> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:02:37 -0300 Felipe Magno de Almeida > > >> > > <felipe.m.alme...@gmail.com> said: > > > > [snip] > > > > >> > I think it would make the port easier to mantain. It would give > RAII, > > >> > STL-compatibility, easier callback support with lambda-support and a > > >> > value-based API. But that's just my opinion. > > >> > > >> elm web has a c api. will always have one. thus we then would have to > > > write a c+ > > >> + elm web by hand AND a c+eo one. no. use eo to write one and efl++ > > > exposes elm > > >> web. webkit api is internal then and thats how it should be. > > > > > > I think Felipe was referring to the internal of WebKit talking to efl > which > > > is already in c++ and would likely benefit from using the c++ with no > > > penalty. > > > > Exactly. Sorry for not being clear. I didn't mean use EFL++ for the > > elm_web, but for the WebKit backend for EFL. There's no reason to use > > the C EFL API by C++ code, IMO. > > oh - then i don't know .. but i suspect the code is already done and using > efl's c interface inside the c++ code as that is working today already. > > -- > ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- > The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse > Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition > Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows > Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
