On 23/07/14 17:30, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> wrote: >> On 22/07/14 20:10, Davide Andreoli wrote: > > [snip] > >> You are right, sounds completely wrong. > > As discussed in the IRC. This is indeed wrong. I'll fix the example > that uses this function to use the layout's one. I mistakenly thought > the elm_button had legacy functions with the same name (with different > prefix) but it doesn't. Tom already explained I should've asked first > before commiting and will do next time.
Thanks. It's less about asking before committing (though please do), but it's more about asking when modifying parts of the efl you are less familiar with, especially when it's API, and especially when things look wrong (not being able to set text on a button is wrong). -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
